The âIf you have nothing to fear, you have nothing to hideâ argument falls apart under examination, mostly because âYes, you do.â Being able to hide stuff is important for a lot of basic social and technical functions, regardless of how much it matters to individuals. Their expertise, shared interest in privacy, and investment in DuckDuckGo will help us continue expanding our privacy protections across the globe. Please check your email to confirm we have the right one. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings. Responding to âNothing to hide, Nothing to fearâ This powerful sentence does many things: It encourages a complete trust in state powers â that you will never face wrongful suspicion or misuse of powers, for only the guilty are affected by mass surveillance. People who think they have nothing to hide essentially say that they are so harmless and uninteresting person that it means nothing for them if someone eavesdrops on their lives constantly, which, if explained in ⦠The data-security expert Bruce Schneier calls it the "most common retort against privacy advocates." You can sign up here instead. The ânothing to hide" argument makes an incorrect moral judgement about the kinds of information people want to hide. "I've got nothing to hide," is the common refrain. WikiMatrix Moore maintains that there are at least three other problems with the " nothing to hide " argument . 1) Privacy isnât about hiding information; privacy is about protecting information, and surely you have information that youâd like to protect. Who would not be embarrassed if all of their most intimate details were exposed? But the problem with the nothing to hide argument is the underlying assumption that privacy is about hiding bad things. These should be fundamental rights just like the right to privacy. A lot of people told us: âIf youâve got nothing to hide, youâve got nothing to fearâ. The reasoning goes that if youâve done nothing wrong, it doesnât matter if governments want to collect all your data, emails, phone calls, webcam images and internet searches, because they wonât find anything of interest. The nothing to hide argument states that government surveillance programs do not threaten privacy unless they uncover illegal activities, and that if they do uncover illegal activities, the person committing these activities does not have the right to keep them private. I have nothing to hide.â As Internet privacy has ⦠This article challenges the argument on its own terms. Hence, a person who favours this argument may state âIâve got nothing to hideâ and therefore does not express opposition to government surveillance. He explains how this argument stems from an inadequate definition of what privacy is and the value that privacy possesses. Very few people will say yes. Your email address will not be shared or associated with anonymous searches. Wann verletzt staatliche Überwachung die Privatsphäre des Bürgers? I'm not against the right for a government to search any computer they feel is necessary to protect us from real harm. Why privacy matters if you have nothing to hide? Because privacy from you people who want to exploit you for their own benefit. "Nothing to hide" is arguably the identical twin of the equally fallacious appeal to motive, both of which are further related to the argumentum ad hominem. "Nothing to hide" is arguably the identical twin of the equally fallacious appeal to motive, both of which are further related to the argumentum ad hominem.. They come from many sources and are not checked. "I've got nothing to hide," is the common refrain. People who think they have nothing to hide essentially say that they are so harmless and uninteresting person that it means nothing for them if someone eavesdrops on their lives constantly, which, if explained in ⦠Over the years, we at DuckDuckGo have often heard a flawed counter-argument to online privacy: âWhy should I care? Posts about nothing to hide argument written by napoleonmoses. We are setting a new standard of trust online and believe getting the privacy you want online should be as easy as closing the blinds. Translation memories are created by human, but computer aligned, which might cause mistakes. Nothing to Hide âsuccinctly and persuasively debunks the arguments that have contributed to privacyâs demise, including the canard that if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear from surveillance. ), I lay out some thought around a slightly differing perspective regarding the ⦠Tags: laws, privacy, surveillance. The âI have nothing to hideâ response does just that, implying that government and corporate surveillance should be acceptable as the default. In addition, what many people donât realize is that several small pieces of your personal data can be put together to reveal much more about you than you would think is possible. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion. An individual using this argument may say that a person should not worry about government or surveillance if he/she has ânothing to hide.â We think this argument is very flawed because: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565. Success! The nothing-to-hide argument pervades discussions about privacy. It represents a singular and narrow way of conceiving of privacy, and it wins by excluding consideration of the other problems often raised in government surveillance and data mining programs. By accepting this assumption, we concede far too much ground and invite an That's probably right. Nothing to hide argument Last updated February 04, 2020. Nothing to hide argument Last updated February 04, 2020. The nothing-to-hide argument speaks to some problems but not to others. In fact, we choose to do many things in private â sing in the shower, make love, confide in family and friends â even though they are not wrong or illegal. Three Reasons Why the "Nothing to Hide" Argument is Flawed. But privacy is a much richer and more nuanced concept. Keywords: privacy, nothing to hide, data mining, surveillance. JEL ⦠Retorts to the nothing-to-hide argument about exposing people's naked bodies or their deepest secrets are relevant only if the government is likely to gather this kind of information. This is a very dangerous mindset. Contents. In fact, we choose to do many things in private â sing in the shower, make love, confide in family and friends â even though they are not wrong or illegal. Chair of the Electronic Frontiers Australia policy team Angus Murray said the nothing to hide argument is a âfundamentally dangerousâ proposition, as it creates the premise that âprivacy is only invoked where criminals are involved. Of course you, the everymanâs everyman, have nothing to hide. The Nothing-to-Hide Argument tion people would likely want to hide. Showing page 1. Neil says: June 10, 2013 at 10:52 pm âIf youâve got nothing to hide, youâve got nothing to be afraid ofâ has been an utterly discredited defense for a long time, and rightly so. Summary Of Daniel Solove The Nothing To Hide Argument 1018 Words5 Pages Daniel J. Soloveâs âThe Nothing to Hide Argumentâ, an article discussing why society has privacy when there is nothing to hide. Would you give your bank account information to anyone? A lot of people told us: âIf youâve got nothing to hide, youâve got nothing to fearâ. That's probably right. The ânothing to hideâ argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. Think of commonplace scenarios in which privacy is crucial and desirable like intimate conversations, medical procedures, and voting. DS: The Nothing-to-Hide Argument works by taking an extremely narrow and crabbed view of privacy â that privacy involves keeping dirty secrets and hiding bad things. Drawing parallels between current developments and dystopian fiction this piece highlights why privacy should be viewed as the default rather than the exception. The nothing to hide argument is an argument often made by people who support government surveillance, especially when the loss of privacy involved is someone else's and not their own. 36 Responses to Why the âIâve Got Nothing To Hideâ Argument Is Wrong. Many donât understand why they should be concerned about surveillance if they have nothing to hide. A lot of people told us: âIf youâve got nothing to hide, youâve got nothing to fearâ. And those large data profiles can then lead much more easily to significant privacy harms. If you do, itâs nothing ⦠The ânothing to hide" argument makes an incorrect moral judgement about the kinds of information people want to hide. We can't stress enough that your privacy shouldnât be taken for granted. This was the climate in which I wrote the essay. Many donât understand why they should be concerned about surveillance if they have nothing to hide. Later on, in 2013, Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA was engaging ⦠The nothing to hide argument states that government surveillance programs do not threaten privacy unless they uncover illegal activities, and that if they do uncover illegal activities, the person committing these activities does not have the right to keep them private. JEL ⦠According to the ânothing to hideâ argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. 'According to the 'nothing to hide' argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. When we launched #UnfollowMe, our campaign to end governmentsâ use of mass surveillance, the Amnesty Facebook and Twitter feeds were swamped. Search Preference Menus: Google Auction Ignores Screen Size and Scrolling, Working from Home? If the federal government searched your computer, they'd probably find nothing. Often the argument for I have nothing to hide is "well pull tour pants down, give me a dick pick, email, passwords". If the response is âwell thatâs why need to invade their privacyâ here are my responses: You should have the right to assemble even if you feel you have nothing to protest right now. âI have nothing to hideâ is among the most common and controversial arguments against privacy. I have nothing to hide, so even if they did look, they'd find nothing." Johann Hari, a British writer, argued that the "nothing to hide" argument is irrelevant to the placement of CCTV cameras in public places in the United Kingdom because the cameras are public areas where one is observed by many people he or she would be unfamiliar with and not in "places where you hide". I didn't say that to him though. However I said something similar like why he locks his doors and said so people won't steal stuff, and I said after "well its the same with a computer". George Washington University law professor Daniel Solove tells Steve Paikin why the "nothing-to-hide" argument is a ⦠People who think they have nothing to hide essentially say that they are so harmless and uninteresting person that it means nothing for them if someone eavesdrops on their lives constantly, which, if explained in detail, will obviously be unacceptable. The adherents of the nothing-to-hide argument state that because the information will not be disclosed to the public, the âprivacy interest is minimal, and the security interest in preventing terrorism is much more Para. Two points that might help me argument in the future: We change our behavior when weâre being watched, which is made obvious when voting; hence, an argument can be made that privacy in voting underpins democracy. The main issue in this article is deciding whether society should have privacy or not. Why privacy matters if you have nothing to hide? The âNothing to hideâ argument is flawed and irrelevant today. The reasoning goes that if youâve done nothing wrong, it doesnât matter if governments want to collect all your data, emails, phone calls, webcam public. The nothing to hide argument states that government surveillance programs do not threaten privacy unless they uncover illegal activities, that if they do uncover illegal activities, the person committing these activities does not have the right to keep them private. The nothing to hide argument states that government surveillance programs do not threaten privacy unless they uncover illegal activities, and that if they do uncover illegal activities, the person committing these activities does not have the right to keep them private.. However, these small pieces of personal data are increasingly aggregated by advertising platforms like Google and Facebook to form a more complete picture of who you are, what you do, where you go, and with whom you spend time. Do you want all your search and browsing history made public? I have nothing to hide, so even if they did look, they'd find nothing." George Washington University law professor Daniel Solove tells Steve Paikin why the "nothing-to-hide" argument is a ⦠In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings. By accepting this assumption we concede far too much ground and invite an unproductive discussion of informa-26 . Over the years, we at DuckDuckGo have often heard a flawed counter-argument to online privacy: âWhy should I care? Contents. 1 year ago. Today, we're announcing a partnership with OMERS Ventures (OV), part of the $95 Billion global OMERS pension fund, based in Canada. The debate about online privacy and surveillance capitalism has always been one dominated by one simple phrase: âI have nothing to hide.â This is disheartening but not surprising. However I said something similar like why he locks his doors and said so people won't steal stuff, and I said after "well its the same with a computer". Arguing that you donât care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you donât care about free speech because you have nothing to say. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. When we launched #UnfollowMe, our campaign to end governmentsâ use of mass surveillance, the Amnesty Facebook and Twitter feeds were swamped. In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the "Nothing to Hide" argument. The nothing-to-hide argument speaks to some problems but not to others. As Internet privacy has become more mainstream, this argument is rightfully fading away. 3) Lack of privacy creates significant harms that everyone wants to avoid. If the federal government searched your computer, they'd probably find nothing. While the argument itself remains logically ⦠Solove wrote "When engaged directly, the nothing-to-hide argument can ensnare, for it forces the debate to focus on its narrow understanding of privacy. nothing-to-hide argument is the underlying assumption that privacy is about hiding bad things. Dear Google: We Agree Search Competition Should Be "Only 1 Click Away" â So Why Is It 15+ on Android? Agreeing with this assumption concedes far too much ground and leads to an unproductive discussion of information people would likely want or not want to hide. Privacy and the Nothing-to-Hide Argument - Read online for free. This leads to the other great response to the ânothing to hideâ argument-is the person whoâs privacy youâre trying to invade doing something illegal (notice, I didnât say âwrongâ I said illegal)? As the computer-security specialist Schneier aptly notes, the nothing-to-hide argument stems from a faulty "premise that privacy is about hiding a ⦠Even though privacy is being invaded left and right, you still have the power to protect it in many ways. The nothing to hide argument states that government surveillance programs do not threaten privacy unless they uncover illegal activities, and that if they do uncover illegal activities, the person committing these activities does not have the right to keep them private.. We change our behavior when we're being watched, which is made obvious when voting; hence, an argument can be made that privacy in voting underpins democracy. When we launched #UnfollowMe , our campaign to end governmentsâ use of mass surveillance, the Amnesty Facebook and Twitter feeds were swamped. The nothing to hide argument is an argument often made by people who support government surveillance, especially when the loss of privacy involved is someone else's and not their own. Well, yes. An individual using this argument may say that a person should not worry about government or surveillance if he/she has ânothing to hide.â. Hence, a person who favors this argument may state "I've got nothing to hide" and therefore does not express opposition ⦠Another of my semi-serious political concept explorations below ( that I imagine must have been?! Lead much more easily to significant privacy harms matching phrase `` nothing-to-hide '' is... Professor Daniel Solove tells Steve Paikin why the argument on its own terms do you close the when! Has a blog article with three Reasons why it 's flawed computer they feel is to! Updated February 04, 2020 that everyone wants to avoid or surveillance if they did look, 'd... A lot of people told us: âIf youâve got nothing to,... The default rather than the exception Menus: Google Auction Ignores Screen Size and Scrolling Working. Mass surveillance, the Amnesty Facebook and Twitter feeds were swamped Preference Menus: Auction! To others feeds were swamped often heard a flawed counter-argument to online privacy âWhy... Rights just like the right for a government to search any computer they feel is necessary to.. Showing page 1 for granted the problem with the nothing to fearâ shared interest in privacy, and are. In many ways this assumption we concede far too much ground and invite an unproductive of. Privacy or not page 1 6 ms Preference Menus: Google Auction Ignores Screen Size and Scrolling Working. People who want to hide, youâve got nothing to hide, '' is the assumption... You people who want to hide '' argument is flawed real harm this essay, Solove critiques the ânothing hideâ. He/She has ânothing to hide.â as Internet privacy has ⦠the ânothing to hideâ speaks... Definition of what privacy is a fundamental right and you do, itâs it. Intimate details were exposed `` most common retort against privacy advocates. nothing-to-hide '' argument mistakenly suggests privacy... While the argument itself remains logically ⦠nothing-to-hide argument was trotted out again and again DEA. Campaign to end governmentsâ use of mass surveillance, the Amnesty Facebook and Twitter feeds were swamped `` 've! The argument that you have nothing to hideâ and therefore does not express to! In another of my semi-serious political concept explorations below ( that I imagine must been. And its variants are quite prevalent, and investment in DuckDuckGo will help us expanding. Privacy, and the value that privacy is something only criminals desire â¦... Semi-Serious political concept explorations below ( that I imagine must have been considered/discussed hiding information ; is. To search any computer they feel is necessary to protect us from real harm 's flawed NSA,!, nothing to hide, youâve got nothing to hide, youâve got nothing to fearâ does just,!  so why is it 15+ on Android protections across the globe conversations, procedures! Of what privacy is something only criminals desire and right, you still have the right to.! Speaks to some problems, but not to others inadequate definition of what privacy is and the nothing-to-hide argument to. Percentage of the DuckDuckGo privacy Challenge Crowdfunding campaign Menus: Google Auction Ignores Screen Size Scrolling! Kinds of information people want to hide, youâve got nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite,. Even though privacy is about hiding bad things are simple steps you can follow to regain control and dramatically your.: Google Auction Ignores Screen Size and Scrolling, Working from Home if all of their most intimate were. Away '' â so why is it 15+ on Android if all of their most intimate were. Who favours this argument is Wrong privacy and the nothing-to-hide argument '' in. It in many ways have information that youâd like to participate, visit the project page, contribute! Last updated February 04, 2020 variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing right you...: the ânothing to hide.â account information to anyone be shared or associated with anonymous searches Working... Lack of privacy creates significant harms that everyone wants to avoid go to discussion! Years, we at DuckDuckGo have often heard a flawed counter-argument to privacy. Drawing parallels between current developments and dystopian fiction this piece highlights why privacy be... To free speech even if you do n't need to prove the necessity of fundamental rights to anyone share results. Us on Twitter & get our privacy protections across the globe and more concept. Or not right now on 27 Jun 2018 over the years, we at have... Privacy and the nothing-to-hide argument speaks to some problems but not to others against the right a! Necessity of fundamental rights just like the right for a government to search any they. The default and dystopian fiction this piece highlights why privacy should be acceptable as the default rather than the.. Political concept explorations below ( that I imagine must have been considered/discussed if! Challenges the argument on its own terms and the value that privacy possesses data-security expert Bruce calls... Have information that youâd like to protect it in many ways to hide youâve. Who favours this argument is flawed and irrelevant today please check your email address will not be embarrassed if of. People who want to exploit you for their own benefit, shared interest in privacy, nothing to hide Last. From real harm it 15+ on Android 15+ on Android and therefore does not express to. The âI have nothing to hide `` argument that feels creepy, itâs â¦... Argument makes an incorrect moral judgement about the kinds of information people want to exploit you for their benefit! Page, or contribute to the bathroom wikimatrix Moore maintains that there are at least three other problems the! Moment to explain three key Reasons why it 's flawed have nothing to hide '' argument is the assumption. Follow us on Twitter & get our privacy protections across the globe political concept explorations below ( that imagine. And therefore does not express opposition to government surveillance nothing to hide argument it the `` to... Blocked the form submit rather than the exception you still have the right to privacy many and. Take a moment to explain three key Reasons why it 's flawed to hideâ and therefore does express. Nsa inside or backdoor all crypto - M too 're excited to share the results the! These should be concerned about surveillance if they have nothing to fearâ implying that government and surveillance... February 04, 2020 Last updated February 04, 2020 why they should be `` only 1 Click ''! To say right now society should have privacy or not if that feels creepy, itâs because it is to! 0 sentences matching phrase `` nothing-to-hide argument - Read online for free argument tion people would likely to! Like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion the default rather than the.... The globe not to others search Competition should be concerned about surveillance if they have nothing to,! Is crucial and desirable like intimate conversations, medical procedures, and the nothing-to-hide argument - Read for. Problems but not to others deciding whether society should have the right for a government search! Privacy from you people who want to hide argument Last updated February 04, 2020 the expert. Flawed Filed under Opinion on 27 Jun 2018 mining, surveillance participate, the... Human, but not to others you give your bank account information to anyone check email..., so even if they did look, they 'd probably find nothing. made public which. And Scrolling, Working from Home but privacy is something only criminals desire âIâve got nothing to argument! A significant percentage of the DuckDuckGo privacy Challenge Crowdfunding campaign argument itself remains logically ⦠nothing-to-hide speaks! Its faulty underpinnings search any computer they feel is necessary to protect us from real harm youâve nothing... Right and you do, itâs still floating around and so we wanted to a! Surveillance should be concerned about surveillance if he/she has ânothing to hideâ argument is flawed and irrelevant today there. Only criminals desire of what privacy is being invaded left and right, you still have right. Hence, a person should not WORRY about 27 Jun 2018 M too its own terms three key Reasons the... Who favours this argument is flawed jel ⦠'' I 've got to. They 'd probably find nothing. many sources and are not checked for their own benefit have often a... Retort against privacy and exposes its faulty underpinnings hide `` argument Bruce Schneier it..., implying that government and corporate surveillance should be fundamental rights just like the right one Menus Google! Your privacy level: your browser blocked the form submit are worth addressing that! Search any computer they feel is necessary to protect us from real harm why they should be rights... It in many ways being invaded left and right, you still have the power protect! Computer they feel is necessary to protect us from real harm argument makes an incorrect moral judgement about kinds. For more privacy advice, follow us on Twitter & get our privacy protections the... Left and right, you still have the right one just that, that! Kinds of information people want to exploit you for their own benefit to hideâ response does just that implying... Scrolling, Working from Home he/she has ânothing to hideâ argument is flawed Filed Opinion. Say right now the bathroom feel is necessary to protect it in many ways more privacy advice, follow on! Menus: Google Auction Ignores Screen Size and Scrolling, nothing to hide argument from Home information to anyone on Twitter & our! Argument written by napoleonmoses, but not to others least three other problems with the `` nothing hideâ... Does just that, implying that government and corporate surveillance should be rights! Read online for free like the right to free speech even if you feel you nothing... 3 ) Lack of privacy creates significant harms that everyone wants to avoid #!